Florida Debtor
November 17, 2017, 10:48:28 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Florida Debtor - Now even better!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Default  (Read 2394 times)
Dragon
Newbie
*
Posts: 138


View Profile
« on: August 24, 2006, 09:11:32 PM »

The court "has expressed on numerous occasions its preference that litigation disputes be resolved on the merits, not by default". Cody v. Mello, 59 F.3d 13, 15 (2d Cir. 1995); See e.g. Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90,95 (2d Cir. 1993); Traguth v. Zuck, 710 F.2d 90,94 (2d. Cir. 1983); Meehan v. Snow, 652 F.2d 274, 277 (2d Cir. 1981). It has recognized that "`dismissal is "a harsh remedy to be utilized only in extreme situations"'". Colon v. Mack, 56 F.3d 5, 7 (2d Cir. 1995), quoting Jackson v. City of New York, 22 F.3d, 71, 75 (2d Cir. 1994), quoting Harding v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 707 F.2d 46, 50 (2d Cir. 1983), quoting Theilman v. Rutland Hosp., Inc. 455 F.2d 853, 855 (2d Cir. 1972). See also Fletcher v. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, supra.; Patray v. Northwest Publishing, Inc., 931 F. Supp. 865, 868 (Ga. 1996); Jackson v. Canton, 112 F.3d 516, 516 (9th Cir. 1997).
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!